![]() In contrast, if he had competed on his orzdevinwang account, a 3400 performance would lead to a near-zero delta and would have basically no effect on others' rating. Therefore, in the process of moving from the default 1400 rating to its eventual 3400 rating, the zh0ukangyang account took around 2000 rating from other contestants. The rating system is (approximately) zero-sum any rating gained must be lost by other competitors. 95% of the contestants probably won't even read tasks F+ (during the contest).Īnd Zhou Kangyang did not use two accounts in the same game, which has no impact on the rating. Googleable H might have been a weak part of this contest, but lets be honest guyz. He had coordinated contests in the past which were pretty high-quality. I just think that coordinator of Goodbye doesn't deserve all the hate. Goodbye wasn't the best round, but all of you keep forgetting, that when you say "It's bad", you are comparing it with other CF rounds, which are mostly flawless. So these problems didn't affect the majority of the contestants, and they mirorly affected the minority of contestants (I doubt that many 2000+ guyz google tasks to get free points). 95% of the contestants probably won't even read tasks F+ (during the contest). There was indeed a considerable problem with G, but a correct implementation was written after the round and the correct solutions were taken in account during/after the system testing, so it didn't affect the results. Anyway, It's funny to see complaints about weak pretests in a quite easy problem.Īlso one of your complaints is that Goodbye was a Mathforces round - what's the point of competing in programming if you don't want to go into math? Math and informatics lay close to each other. Pretests are called PRE!tests because they do not guarantee you that your solution is correct. Change the password to a random one and do not log into the account anymore.įor participants at the very top (somewhere in the top 50 of the ratings), we are ready to manually deal with the situation and exclude illegal accounts from the rating. All you need to do is simply stop participating from all accounts except one. What should you do if you already have several accounts and want to stop breaking the rules? You should not write to us with a request to delete accounts or transfer data from one account to another. In this case, zh0ukangyang was at the top of the ratings, occupying high places in the rounds. ![]() Remember, with great power comes great responsibility. In cases where rule violations significantly affect the ratings of other participants, we may take drastic measures. By breaking the rules, you automatically agree that punishment may be applied to you. If this is not the case, then you are violating the community rules. Please remember that by registering for any rated contest, you confirm that you are participating with your only account. Unfortunately, it is difficult for us to enforce this rule in almost all cases. In such cases, these accounts do not participate in rated rounds and we do not pay attention to them unless there is some abuse of Codeforces resources. Sometimes additional accounts are created for official, usually collective purposes (writing a post on behalf of a company, etc.). In an ideal world, each Codeforces account corresponds to one specific person. Creating and using additional accounts violates this rule. I would like to remind you again: Codeforces insists on the policy of using a single account. ![]() Today I removed the account zh0ukangyang from the rating, after first nullifying its results in the Pinely Round 3 (Div. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |